Chakravartty, A. (2007) A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Chakravartty, A. (2017). Scientific Realism,
Earman, J. (2006). The implications of general covariance for the ontology and ideology of spacetime. See Dieks (2006): 3–24.
Esfeld, M.(2006). The controversial relationships between science and philosophy: a critical assessment, Vatican City: in GennaroAuletta (ed.), LibreriaEditriceVaticana, pp. 251–275.
French, S. and Ladyman, J.,2011. “In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism,” in A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich (eds.) 2011, pp. 25–42.
Friedman, M.(1983). Foundations of Spacetime Theories: Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hall, B. (2015). Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations. An Elementary Introduction, Dordrecht: Springer.
Hardin, C. L. and Rosenberg, A. (1982). In defence of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 49: 604–15.
Inonu, E. and Wigner, E. P. (1953).On the Contraction of Groups and Their Representations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Scie. (U.S.A.) 39, 510-524.
Kitcher, P. (1993). Advancement of science: Science without legend, objectivity without illuosions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., et al. (2007) Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leplin, J. (1984). Scientific Realism, Berkley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Lange, M. (2002). Baseball, pessimistic inductions and the turnover tallacy. Analysis, 62(4), 281-285.
Laudan, L. (1984) ‘Discussion: Realism Without the Real’, Philosophy of Science 51: 156–62.
Leplin, J. (1997) A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Lewis, P. J. (2001). Why the pessimistic induction is a fallacy. Synthese, 129, 371-380.
Mendes. R.Vilela. (1994) Deformations, stable theories and fundamental constants,I. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 27, 8091-8104.
Papineau, D. (1996). Introduction. In D. Papineau (Ed.), The philosophy of science (pp. 1-20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Psillos, S. (1996). On van Fraassen’s critique of abductive reasoning. Philosophical Quarterly46: 31–47.
Putnam, H. (1975). Mathematics, Matter and Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Redhead, Michael L.G. (2001), The Intelligibility of the Universe, in A.O’Hear (ed.) Philosophy at the New Millennium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Stanford, P. K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saatsi, J.T.(2005). On the Pessimistic Induction and Two Fallacies,Philosophy of Science, Vol. 72, No. 5: 1088-1098.
Suarez, M., Dorato, M., Redei, M.(Eds.) (2010) EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, Dordrecht: Springer, Volume 2: 197–209.
Votsis, I. (2011) ‘Structural Realism: Continuity and its Limits’, in A. Bokulich and P. Bokulich (eds), Scientific Structuralism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Wray, B. (2013). Success and truth in the realism/anti-realism debate, Synthese ,190:1719-1729.
Weinberg, S. (1996). The Quantum Field Theory, volum1, Foundations,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Worrall, J. (1982). ‘Scientific Realism and Scientific Change’, Philosophical Quarterly 32,201–231.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds. Dialéctica, 43(1-2), 99.
)