زارعپور, م. ص.(1396). فلسفۀ ریاضی ویتگنشتاین. دانشگاه شریف.
سیاوشی, ا. (1389). فلسفۀ ریاضی لاکاتوش. فرهنگ و اندیشۀ ریاضی(45), 51-60.
طالب زاده, س. ح. (تابستان 1384). تحلیل فلسفی از نسبت ریاضیات و علم جدید. فصلنامۀ فلسفۀ دانشگاه تهران(10), 51-76.
گنون, ر. (1365). سیطرۀ کمیت و علائم آخرالزمان (ترجمۀ ع. کاردان). مرکز نشر دانشگاهی.
منیری, م. (1397). ساختارگرایی در فلسفۀ ریاضی معاصر. فرهنگ و اندیشۀ ریاضی, 37(63), 37-50
Baker, A. (2011). Explaining the applicability of mathematics in science. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(3), 255-267.
Balaguer, M. (2001). Platonism and anti-platonism in mathematics. Oxford University Press, USA.
Bangu, S. (2012). The Applicability of Mathematics in Science: Indispensability and Ontology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bonheure, D., Gazzola, F., Maz'ya, V., & Hinshelwood, C. N. S. (2019). About mathematics and reality, Albert Einstein (1921 Nobel Prize in Physics), in his Geometry and Experience talk at the Prussian Academy of Sciences in Berlin.
Colyvan, M. (2001). The Indispensability of Mathematics. Oxford university press
Culler, J. (1998). Structuralism.
Frege, G. (1988). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl (Vol. 366). Felix Meiner Verlag.
Giere, R. N. (2004). How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science, 71(5), 742-752.
Gonzalez, W. J. (2014). On representation and models in Bas van Fraassen’s approach. Bas van Fraassen’s approach to representation and models in science, 3-37.
Harvey, A. (2011). The reasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Springer Science+Business Media, 43, 3657-3664.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The age of the world picture. In Science and the Quest for Reality (pp. 70-88). Springer.
Islami, A. (2016). A match not made in heaven: on the applicability of mathematics in physics. Springer.
Ladyman, J. (2014). Structural Realism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Lakatos, I. (1963). Proofs and refutations. Nelson London
Liston, m. (2000). Mark Steiner. The applicability of mathematics as a philosophical problem. Philosophia Mathematica.
Lützen, J. (2011). The Physical Origin of Physically Useful Mathematics. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 36(3), 229-243.
Maudlin, T. (2016). How Mathematics Meets the World. Springer, 91-102
Omnès, R. (2011). Wigner’s “Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics”, Revisited. Foundations of Physics, 1729-1739.
Palmgren, E., & Rasa, T. (2022). Modelling Roles of Mathematics in Physics. Science & Education.
Popper, K. R. (2002a). TRUTH, RATIONALITY, AND THE GROWTH OF SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE. In Conjectures and Refutations (pp. 301-291). Routledge
Popper, K. R. (2002b). Why are the Calculi of Logic and Arithmetic Applicable to Reality? In Conjectures and Refutations. Routledge.
Reck, E., & Schiemer, G. (2019). Structuralism in the Philosophy of Mathematics
Rizza, D. (2013). The applicability of mathematics: Beyond mapping accounts. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 398-412.
Simons, p. (2001). MARK STEINER The Applicability of Mathematics as a Philosophical Problem. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 181-184.
Steiner, M. (1995). The applicabilities of mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 3(2), 129-156.
Steiner, M. (1998). The Applicability of Mathematics As a Philosophical Problem. Harvard University Press.
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Clarendon Press
Wigner, E. p. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciencesCommunications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1-14.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? dialectica, 43(1‐2), 99-124
Ye, F. (2010). The Applicability of Mathematics as a Scientific and a Logical Problem. Philosophia Mathematica, 18, 144-165.
)