نوع مقاله : پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفۀ علم
2 دانشیار گروه فلسفۀ علم و فناوری پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی
چکیده
دو رویکرد متافیزیکی به مسئلۀ پیکان زمان وجود دارد که ناشی از دو تلقیِ متفاوت هیومی و غیرهیومی از قوانین طبیعت است. هدف مقالۀ حاضر این است که استدلال کند این دو رویکرد به مثابۀ دو برنامۀ پژوهشی، به رغم اختلاف بنیادیِ و مسائلی که هر یک درگیر آن هستند، در نهایت ما را به سمت این مسئله اساسی هدایت می‌کنند که تبیین مسئلۀ پیکان زمان نیازمند شناخت ساختار فضازمان در کیهان اولیه است.
دو رویکرد متافیزیکی به مسئلۀ پیکان زمان وجود دارد که ناشی از دو تلقیِ متفاوت هیومی و غیرهیومی از قوانین طبیعت است. هدف مقالۀ حاضر این است که استدلال کند این دو رویکرد به مثابۀ دو برنامۀ پژوهشی، به رغم اختلاف بنیادیِ و مسائلی که هر یک درگیر آن هستند، در نهایت ما را به سمت این مسئله اساسی هدایت می‌کنند که تبیین مسئلۀ پیکان زمان نیازمند شناخت ساختار فضازمان در کیهان اولیه است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
An Appraisal of Two Philosophical Research Programs on the Problem of Time's Arrow
نویسندگان [English]
- Narges Fathalian 1
- Ali Reza Mansouri 2
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Philosophy of Science and Technologyو Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
2 Associate Professor of Philosophy of Science and Technology, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
The problem of time's arrow has sparked two distinct metaphysical approaches, each stemming from opposing Humean and non-Humean perspectives on laws of nature. This paper contends that these approaches, despite their differences and inherent challenges, ultimately converge on a common goal: to explain time's arrow, we must comprehend the structure of spacetime during the universe's early stages.
The problem of time's arrow has sparked two distinct metaphysical approaches, each stemming from opposing Humean and non-Humean perspectives on laws of nature. This paper contends that these approaches, despite their differences and inherent challenges, ultimately converge on a common goal: to explain time's arrow, we must comprehend the structure of spacetime during the universe's early stages.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- time’s arrow
- thermodynamic arrow
- past hypothesis
- spacetime
- (non)Humean approach
|
Ambjørn J, Jurkiewicz J, Loll R. (2008a). “The self-organizing quantum universe”. Sci Am. Jul; 299(1):42-9. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0708-42. PMID: 18623963.
Ambjørn J, Görlich A, Jurkiewicz J, Loll R. (2008b). "Planckian birth of a quantum de sitter universe". Phys Rev Lett. Mar 7;100(9):091304. doi: 10.1103/Phys Rev Lett.100.091304. Epub 2008 Mar 7. PMID: 18352693.
Agassi, J. (1975). "Scientific Problems and Their Roots in Metaphysics," in Science in Flux: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Springer, Dordrecht.
Albert, D. (2000). Time and chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Arthur, R. T. (2019). The Reality of Time Flow. Springer International Publishing.
Berkson, W. (2014). Fields of Force: The Development of a World View from Faraday to Einstein. Routledge.
Bergson, H. (1944). Creative Evolution. Trans. by Arthur Mitchell. New York: Random House.
Boltzmann, Ludwig (1964). Lectures on Gas Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press. Tr. S. G. Brush. Originally published in German in 1896.
Boltzmann, L. (1896). 'On Zermelo's Paper "On the mechanical explanation of irreversible processes". In S. Brush (Ed.), Kinetic Theory, Vol. 2 – Irreversible Processes. Pergamon.
Bricmont, J., (1995). “Science of Chaos or Chaos in Science?,” Physicalia Magazine, 17/3–4: 159–208.
Broad, C. D. (1938). Examination of McTaggart’s Philosophy.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Callender, C. (2004a). “Measures, Explanation and the Past: Should ‘Special’ Initial Conditions Be Explained?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, 195–217.
Callender, C. (2004b). “There is no puzzle about the low-entropy past”. In C. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science (pp. 240–255). London: Blackwell.
Callender, C. (2011). “Thermodynamic Asymmetry in Time”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/time-thermo/>.
Carroll, S. M. (2008). “DoesTime Run Backward in Other Universes?” Scientific American. 298N6, 26-33 [arXiv:0811.3772 [gr-qc]].
Carroll, S. M., Chen, J. (2004). “Spontaneous Inflation and the Origin of the Arrow of Time.” URL hep-th/0410270.
Carroll, S. M., Chen, J. (2005). “Does Inflation Provide Natural Initial Conditions for the Universe?” URL gr-qc/0505037.
Chen, E. K. (2020), The Past Hypothesis and the Nature of Physical Laws, Forthcoming in Barry Loewer, EricWinsberg, and BradWeslake (eds.), Time’s Arrows and the Probability Structure of the World, Harvard University Press.
Earman, J. (2006). “The “Past Hypothesis”: Not even false”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (3):399-430.
Eddington, A. S. (1929). The Nature of Physical World. Macmillan, New York: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2006). “Physics in the real universe: time and spacetime”. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 38, 1797–1824.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2014). “The Evolving Block Universe and the Meshing Together of Times”. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1326(1): 26–41. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.7243.
Ellis, G. F. R., & Drossel, B. (2020). “Emergence of time”. Foundations of Physics, 50(3), 161-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-020-00331-x
Esfeld M. (2006), Popper on Irreversibility and the Arrow of Time in Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford and David Miller (eds.): Karl Popper: A centenary assessment. Volume III: Science and social science. Aldershot: Ashgate Spring 2006.
Farr, M. (2022). “What’s so special about initial conditions? Understanding the past hypothesis in directionless time.” In Rethinking the Concept of Law of Nature: Natural Order in the Light of Contemporary Science (pp. 205-224). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Feynman, Richard (1965). The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Frigg, R. (2008). “Chance in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics”, Philosophy of Science, 75, Volume 5, pp. 670-681. Doi: 10.1086/594513.
Frigg, Roman. (2009). “Typicality and the Approach to Equilibrium in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics.” Philosophy of Science 76:997–1008.
Frigg, R. (2010). “Probability in Boltzmannian Statistical Mechanics.” In Gerhard Ernst and Andreas Hüttemann, eds., Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics, pp. 92–118. Cambridge University Press.
Goldstein, S. (2001). “Boltzmann's approach to statistical mechanics,” in J. Bricmont; D. Durr; M. Galavotti; F. Petruccione& N. Zanghi, ed., In: Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives, Springer, Berlin, p. 39.
Goldstein, S. (2012). Typicality and notions of probability in physics. Probability in physics, 59-71.
Goldstein, S., & Lebowitz, J. (2004). “On the (Boltzmann) entropy of nonequilibrium systems”. Physica D, 193, 53–66 Gołosz, J. (2011). Science, Metaphysics, and Scientific Realism. Pol. J. Philos., Volume 5, pp. 27-45.
Gołosz, J., 2011. “Science, Metaphysics, and Scientific Realism”. Pol. J. Philos., Volume 5, pp. 27-45.
Gołosz, J. (2020). “In Defence of a Dynamic View of Reality”. An anthology of philosophical studies, Volume 14, pp. 35-47.
Gołosz, J. (2021). “Entropy and the Direction of Time”. Entropy, 23, 388.
Gołosz, J. (2017). “The Asymmetry of Time: A Philosopher’s Reflections”. Acta Phys. Pol. B, 48, 1935–1946. (p.1940)
Greene, B. (2004). The Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time, and the Texture of Reality. New York: Knopf.
Harmann, P. (1982). Energy, Force and Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Ladyman, J., Ross, D. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes”. In I. Lakatos, & A. Musgrave, (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loew, C. (2018). "Fundamentality and time’s arrow." Philosophy of Science 85.3 (2018): 483-500.
Loewer, B. (2001). “Determinism and Chance.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 32, 609–620.
Loewer, B . (2012). "Two accounts of laws and time." Philosophical studies 160.1 : 115-137.
Maudlin, T. (2007a). The metaphysics within physics. Oxford University press.
Maudlin, T. (2007b). “What Could Be Objective about Probabilities?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science B 38:275–91.
Maudlin, T. (2011). Quantum non-locality and relativity: Metaphysical intimations of modern physics. John Wiley & Sons.
Maudlin, T. (2014). New Foundations for Physical Geometry: The Theory of Linear Structures. Oxford University Press.
Maxwell, J. C. (1878). Ether, Britannica, 9th edition.
North, J. (2002). “What is the Problem about the Time-Asymmetry of Thermodynamics?—A Reply to Price.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, 121–136.
North, J. (2011). Time in thermodynamics. The oxford handbook of philosophy of time, 312-350.
Parker, D. (2005). “Thermodynamic Irreversibility: Does the Big Bang Explain What It Purports to Explain?” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 72, 751–763.
Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Penrose, R. (2005) The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson: London.
Popper, K. (1983). Metaphysics and Criticizability. In D. Miller, & D. Miller (Ed.), A Pocket Popper, K. (2005). Popper Selections (pp. 209-219). Glasgow: Fontana Press.The Road to Reality. New York: Knopf.
Popper, K. R. (1979). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon press.
Price, H. (1996). Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time, New York: Oxford University Press.
Price, H. (2002a). “Boltzmann’s Time Bomb.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53, 83–119.
Price, H. (2002b). “Burbury’s Last Case: The Mystery of the Entropic Arrow.” In Craig Callender, ed., Time, Reality and Experience, pp. 19–56. Cambridge University Press.
Price, H. (2004). “On the Origins of the Arrow of Time: Why There is Still a Puzzle about the Low-Entropy Past.” In Christopher Hitchcock, ed., Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science, pp. 219–239. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rovelli, C. (2019). "Where was past low-entropy?." Entropy 21.5: 466.
Sklar, L. (1993). Physics and chance: Philosophical issues in the foundations of statistical mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Sklar, L. (2005). “Physics and the Direction of Time”. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd ed.; Borchert, D.M., Ed.; Thomson Gale: Detroit, MI, USA; New York, NY, USA.
Smolin, L. (2013). Time Reborn: From the Crisis in Physics to the Future of the Universe; Houghton Mifflin Harcourt: Boston, MA, USA, p. 257.
Uffink, J. (2007) “Compendium to the foundations of classical statistical mechanics”, in Handbook for the Philosophy of Physics, J. Butterfield and J. Earman (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 924–1074.
Wallace, D. (2011). The logic of the past hypothesis. In Barry Loewer, Eric Winsberg & Brad Weslake (eds.), Currently-unnamed volume discussing David Albert's "Time and Chance".
Weinberg, S. (1993). The first three minutes: a modern view of the origin of the universe. basic books.
Weinberg, S. (2008). Cosmology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1993;
Winsberg, E. (2004). “Can Conditioning on the “Past Hypothesis” Militate Against the Reversibility Objections?” Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 71, 489–504.
Winsberg, E. (2008). “Laws and Chances in Statistical Mechanics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, 872–888.
|
)