Boon, M. (2006). How science is applied in technology. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20(01), 27-47.
Bud, R. (2012). “Applied Science”: A Phrase in Search of a Meaning. Isis, 103(3), 537-545.
Bud, R. (2014). ‘Applied science’ in nineteenth-century Britain: public discourse and the creation of meaning, 1817–1876. History and Technology, 30(1-2), 3-36. doi: 10.1080/07341512.2014.921416
Bueno, O. (2006). Representation at the Nanoscale. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 617-628.
Bueno, O., &Colyvan, M. (2011). An Inferential Conception of the Application of Mathematics. Noûs, 45(2), 345-374. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00772.x
Bunge, M. (1966). Technology as Applied Science. Technology and Culture, 7(3), 329-347.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: the Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Calvert, J. (2004). The Idea of ‘Basic Research’ in Language and Practice. Minerva, 42(3), 251-268. doi: 10.1023/B:MINE.0000038307.58765.b4
Cartwright, N. (1976). How do we apply science? In R. S. Cohen, C. A. Hooker, A. C. Michalos & J. W. Van Evra (Eds.), PSA 1974. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Vol. 32, pp. 713-719): Springer.
Channell, D. F. (2017). A History of Technoscience: Erasing the Boundaries Between Scienceand Technology: Routledge.
Coleridge, S. T. (1818). A Treatise on Method. London: B. Fellowes.
Douglas, H. (2014). Pure science and the problem of progress. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46, 55-63.
Drexler, K. E. (1992). Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Eigler, D. M., & Schweizer, E. K. (1990). Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope. Nature, 344(6266), 524-526.
Feibleman, J. K. (1961). Pure science, applied science, technology, engineering: an attempt at definitions. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 305-317.
Folsch, S., Martinez-Blanco, J., Yang, J., Kanisawa, K., & Erwin, S. C. (2014). Quantum dots with single-atom precision. [Letter]. Nat Nano, 9(7), 505-508. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.129
French, S. (2003). A Model-Theoretic Account of Representation (Or, I Don't Know Much about Art . . . but I Know It Involves Isomorphism(Philosophy of Science, 70, 1472-1483.
Frigg, R. (2006). Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria, 50, 49–65.
Frigg, R. (2010). Models and fiction. Synthese, 172, 251–268.
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2006). Models in Science. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Stanford University.
Frigg, R., & Nguyen, J. (2016). Scientific Representation In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition ed.).
Kant, I., & Friedman, M. (2004 (1786)). Kant: Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science: Cambridge University Press.
Kline, R. (1995). Construing" technology" as" applied science": Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880-1945. Isis, 194-221.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society: Harvard University Press.
Lenhard, J. (2006). Surprised by a nanowire: Simulation, control, and understanding. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 605-616.
Marcovich, A., & Shinn, T. (2014). Toward a New Dimension: Exploring the Nanoscale: Oxford University Press, USA.
Mody, C. C. M. (2011). Instrumental community: Probe microscopy and the path to nanotechnology: MIT Press.
Morrison, M. (2006). Applying science and applied science: What’s the difference? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 20(01), 81-91.
Murphy, C. J., & Coffer, J. L. (2002). Quantum Dots: A Primer. Applied Spectroscopy, 56(1), 16A-27A.
Niiniluoto, I. (1993). The aim and structure of applied research. Erkenntnis, 38(1), 1-21.
Niiniluoto, I. (2014). Values in design sciences. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46(Supplement C), 11-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.002
OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development: OECD.
Pielke, R. (2012). Basic research as a political symbol. Minerva, 50(3), 339-361.
Rihll, T. E., & Tucker, J. V. (2002). Practice makes perfect: knowledge of materials in classical Athens. Science and Mathematics in Ancient Greek Culture, 274-305.
Roll-Hansen, N. (2017). A Historical Perspective on the Distinction Between Basic and Applied Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1007/s10838-017-9362-3
Suárez , M. (2003). Scientific representation: against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 172, 225-244.
Suárez, M. (2010). Scientific Representation. Philosophy Compass, 5(1), 91-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00261.x
Winsberg, E. (2006). Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Simulation at the Nanoscale. In J. Lenhard, G. Küppers & T. Shinn (Eds.), Simulation: Pragmatic Construction of Reality (pp. 139-151). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Winsberg, E. (2009). Models and Theories at the Nano-scale. Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 2(1), 139.
)