Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 2. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Faculty of Law, Theologu and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran

2 1. PhD Student of Philosophy of Science, Faculty of Law, Theologu and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Phenomenal qualities of conscious mental states are commonly known as “qualia”. We say that a particular mental state has qualia if and only if There is something that it is like to be the mental state. Some philosophers have challenged the epistemic and explanatory values of qualia. They argue that the concept of qualia has no role to play in a mature and well-organized psychological theory. Consequently, this concept has no epistemic value. This paper aims at explaining and criticizing these arguments. It will be argued that these arguments are ineffective and cannot establish that the concept of qualia can not have functions in a scientific theories. The distinction between metaphysical subjectivity and epistemic objectivity, as it will be shown, can establish a scientific place for the concept of qualia.

Keywords

  1. Allport, A. (1988). What Concept of Consciousness, In Consciousness and Contemporary Science. edited by Marcal, A and Bisiach, E. New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Bisiach, E. (1988). The (Haunted) Brain and Consciousness, In Consciousness and Contemporary Science. edited by Marcel, A and Bisiach E, 101-20. New York: Oxford University Press
  3. Bouckoms, A. J. (1994). Limbic Surgery for Pain. In Textbook of Pain. edited by Wall, P.D & Melzack, R, 1171-1187. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston.
  4. Conee, E. (1984). A Defense of Pain. Philosophical Studies, 46, 239-248.
  5. Churchland, P. (1985). Reduction, Qualia and the Direct Introspection of Brain States, In A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  6. Churchland, P. (1981). Eliminative Materialism and the Propositional Attitudes. Journal

of Philosophy, 78, 67-90.

  1. Denneth, D. (1978). Why You Can’t Make a Computer that Feels Pain, In Brainstorms. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1978. First Published in Syenthese. 1978, 38: 415-49
  2. Flanagan, O. (1992). Consiousness Reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press
  3. Foltz, E. L., & White, L. E. (1962). Pain „Relief" by Frontal Cingulotomy. Journal of

Neurosurgery, 19, 89-100.

  1. Foss, J. (1993). Subjectivity, Objectivity and Nagel on Consciousness, Dialogue 32: 725-736
  2. Freeman, W. J., Watts, W., & Hunt, T. (1942). Psychosurgery; intelligence, emotion and

social behavior following prefrontal lobotomy for mental disorders. Springfield: C. C. Thomas.

  1. Gendler T, & Hawthorne, J. (2002). Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press
  2. Gregory, R. (1970). The Intelligent Eye. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  3. Hardy, J. D., Wolff, H. J., & Goodell, H. (1952). Pain Sensations and Reactions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
  4. Horgan, T and Woodward, J. (1985). Folk Psychology is Here to Stay, The Philosophical Review, 94: 197-226
  5. IASP-Task-Force-On-Taxonomy (1994). IASP Pain Terminology. In H. Merskey & N.

Bogduk (Eds.), Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms (pp. 209-214). Seattle: IASP Press.

 

  1. Kaufman, R. (1985). Is the Concept of Pain Incoherent? Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23, 279-284.
  2. Kim, J. (2010). Philosophy of Mind. Routledge
  3. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press
  4. Levin, J. (1994). Out of the closet: A Qualophil Confronts Qualophobia, Philosophical Topics, 22: 107-26
  5. Levin, M. (1981). Phenomenal Properties, Philosophy and Phenomenal Research, 42: 42-58
  6. Luper, S. (2004). Epistemic Relativism, Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology: 271-295
  7. Marcel, A. (1988).Phenomenal Experience and Functionalism, In Consciousness and Contemporary Science. edited by Marcel, A and Bisiach, E, 121-58. New York: Oxford University Press
  8. Natsoulus, T. (1978). Consciousness, American Psycologist, 33, pp. 906-14
  9. Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a Bat? Philosophical Review, 83: 435–456.
  10. Nikolinakos, D. (1994). General Anesthesia, Consciousness and the Skeptical Challenge, Journal of Philosophy 91: 88-104
  11. Ploner, M., Freund, H. J., & A. Schnitzler, A. (1999). Pain Affect without Pain Sensation in a
  12. Patient with a Postcentral Lesion. Pain, 81(1/2), 211-214.
  13. Searl, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press
  14. Soames, S. (2002). Beyond Rigidity. Oxford University Press
  15. Stich, S. (1983). From Folk Psychology to Cognitive Science. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  16. Weiskrantz, L. (1988). Some Contributions of Neuropsychology of Vision and Memory to Problem of Consciousness” In Consciousness and Contemporary Science. edited by Marcal, A and Bisiach, E, 183-99. New York: Oxford University Press
  17. White, J. C., & Sweet, W. H. (1969). Pain and the Neurosurgeon: A Forty-Year of Experience. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.
  18. Wilkes, K. (1984). Is Consciousness Important, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35:223-43
  19. Wilkinson, H. A., Davidson, K. M., & Davidson, R. I. (1999). Bilateral anterior cingulotomy for chronic noncancer pain. Neurosurgery, 45(5), 1129.
  20. Woodruff-Smith, D. (1986). Rey Cogitans: The Unquestionability of consciousness, In Perspectives on Mind. edited by H. Otto and J. Tuedio, 25-31. Dordrecht: Kluwer
  21. Yen, C. P., Kung, S. S., Su, Y. F., Lin, W. C., Huang, S. L., & Kwan, A. L. (2005).

Stereotactic bilateral anterior cingulotomy for intractable pain. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 12(8), 886-890.