اکاشا، سمیر (1388). فلسفة علم، ترجمة هومن پناهنده، تهران: فرهنگ معاصر.
برن، ژان (1357). فلسفۀ اپیکور، ترجمۀ ابوالقاسم پورحسینی، تهران: امیرکبیر.
پوپر، کارل (1372). واقعی‌گری و هدف علم، ترجمة احمد آرام، تهران: سروش.
پوپر، کارل (1388). منطق اکتشاف علمی، ترجمة سیدحسین کمالی، تهران: علمی و فرهنگی.
شرف خراسانی، شرف‌‌الدین (1370). نخستین فیلسوفان یونان، تهران: آموزش انقلاب اسلامی.
کاپلستون، فردریک چارلز (1386). تاریخ فلسفه، جلد چهارم از دکارت تا لایب‌نیتس، ترجمة غلامرضا اعوانی، تهران: سروش.
کوهن، تامس (1389). ساختار انقلاب‌های علمی، سعید زیباکلام، تهران: سمت.
گیلیس، دانالد (1387). فلسفة علم در قرن بیستم، حسن میانداری، تهران: سمت.
ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ (1380). پژوهش‌های فلسفی، فریدون فاطمی، تهران: مرکز.
Aguirre, A. (2007). ‘Making prediction in a multiverse: conundrums, dangers, coincidences’, in Universe or Multiverse?, Carr. B, (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alters, B. J. (1997). ‘Whose Nature of Science?’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34:
Ayer, A. J. (1946). Language, Truth and Logic, Dover: New York.
Barrau, A. (2008). ‘Physics in the multiverse’, at: arXiv: 0711. 4460v2 [astro-ph] 28 Jan 2008
Carnap, R. (1936). ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science, 3.
Carr, B and G. F. R. Ellis (2008). ‘Universe or Multiverse?’, Astronomy & Geophysics, 49.
Cartwright, N and R. Roman Frigg (2007). ‘String Theory under Scrutiny’, Physics World, 3. Collins, R. (2007). ‘The multiverse hypothesis: a theistic perspective’, Universe or Multiverse?, Carr. B (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derksen, A. A. (1993). ‘The Seven Sins of Pseudo-Science’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 24.
Ellis, G. F. R, U. Kirchner and W. R. Stoeger (2004). ‘Multiverses and Physical Cosmology’, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 347.
Ellis, G. F. R. (1991). ‘Major Themes in the relalation between philosophy and cosmology’, Mem. S. A. IT, Vol. 62, No. 3.
Ellis, G. F. R. (2006). ‘Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology’, at: arXiv: astro-ph/ 0602280v2 29 Mar.
Ellis. G. and L. Smolin. (2009). ‘The weak anthropic principle and the landscape of string theory’, at: arXiv: 0901. 2414v1 [hep-th] 16 Jan.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis: Hackett.
Hansson. S. O. (2006). ‘Falsificationism Falsified’, Foundations of Science, 11.
Horgan, J. (1997). The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, New York: Basic Book.
Howson, C and P. Urbach (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, Chicago: Open Court.
Kitcher, P (1982). Abusing Science, The Case Against Creationis, Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
Kragh, H (2009). ‘Contemporary History of Cosmology and the Controversy over the Multiverse’, ANNALS OF SCIENCE, Vol. 66, No. 4.
Kraye, J. (2005). The Philosophy of Italien Renaissance, Routledge History of Philosophy, Vol. IV, The Renaissance and Seventeenth-century Rationalism, ed. Taylor. C. C. W, London and New York, Routledge.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970 a). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970 b). ‘Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?’, in: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977). ‘Objectivity, Value Judgement and Theory Choice’, in The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuipers, T. (2007). ‘Introduction: Explication in philosophy of science’, in Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: General Philosophy of Science-Focal Issues, Dov M. Gabbay, Thagard. P and Woods (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lakatos, I. (1970). ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986 a). Counter Factuals, Blackwell & Harvard University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986 b). On The Plurarity of Worlds, Oxford: Blakwell.
Livio, M. and M. J. Rees (2005). ‘Anthropic Reasoning’, Science, 309.
Lugg, A, Bunkum (1987). ‘Flim-Flam and Quackery: Pseudoscience as a Philosophical Problem’, Dialectica 41.
Mahner, M and M. Bunge (1977). Foundations of Biophilosophy, Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
Mahner, M. (2007). ‘Demarcating science from non science, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science: General Philosophy of Science-Focal Issues, Dov M. Gabbay, Thagard. P and Woods (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier.
McMullin, Ernan (1992). The inference that makes science, Milwaukee: Marquette Univrsity Press.
Miller, Clyde Lee (2013), ‘Cusanus, Nicolaus [Nicolas of Cusa]’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer2013Edition), Edward N.Zalta (ed.), <http://plato.stanford.edu/ archives/ sum2013/entries/cusanus/>.
Page, D. N. (2007). ‘Predictions and tests of multiverse theories’, Universe or Multiverse?, Carr. B, (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palonen, V. (2008). ‘Bayesian Considerations on the Multiverse Explanation of Cosmic Fine-Tuning’, at: ArXiv: 0802. 4013.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson.
Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and Refutations, New York: Basic Book.
Rees, M. (2000). Just Six Numbers, New York: Basic Books.
Rees, M. (2003). Our Cosmic Habitat, Princeton University Press.
Rees, M. J. (2007). ‘Cosmology and the multiverse’, in Carr. B (ed.), Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reisch, G. A. (1998). ‘Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience’, Philosophy of Science, 65.
Resnik, D. B. (2000). ‘A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31.
Rothbart, D. (1990). ‘Demarcating Genuine Science from Pseudoscience’, in P. Grim (ed.), Philosophy of Science and the Occult, Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Shapere, D. (2000).‘Testability and Empiricism’, In Agazzi, Ei and Pauri, M (eds.), The Reality of the Unobservable; Observability, Unobservability and their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Siitonen, A. (1984). ‘Demarcation of Science from the Point of View of Problems and Problem-Stating, Philosophia naturalis, 21.
Smolin, L. (2007). ‘Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle’, In Carr. B (ed.), Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smolin, L. (2008). The Trouble with Physics, London: Penguin.
Steinhardt, P. J. and N. Turok (2007). Endless Universe: Beyond the Big Bang, New York: Broadway Book.
Stoeger, Ellis, and Kirchner (2006). ‘Multiverses and Cosmology: Philosophical Issues’, at: ArXiv: astro-ph/0407329.
Stoeger, W. R. (2006). ‘Retroduction, Multiverse Hypotheses and their Testability’, at: ArXiv: astro-ph/0602356.
Susskind, L. (2006). The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design, New York: Little Brown
Tegmark, M. (2007). ‘The multiverse hierarchy’, In Carr. B (ed.), Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thagard, P. (1978). ‘Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience’, In P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.), Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 1, East Lansing, MI.
Vilenkin, A. (1998). ‘Unambiguous Probabilities in an Eternally Inflating Universe’, Physical Review Letters, 81.
Vollmer, G. (1993). ‘Wozu Pseudowissenschaften gut sind’ [What Pseudosciences Are Good For], in G. Vollmer, Wissenschafts theorie im Einsatz [Philosophy of Science in Action], Hirzel-Verlag: Stuttgart.
Weinberg, S. (2007). ‘Living in the multiverse’, in Carr. B. (ed.), Universe or Multiverse?, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, London: Roughtledge & Kegan Paul.
)