Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran,
10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775
Abstract
This article offers a critical reassessment of the dominant narrative in architectural historiography, challenging the myth of the “heroic architect” as the sole originator of structural innovation. Through a three-phase framework—from intuitive imitation to analytical abstraction and finally mutual interplay—it argues that modern structural breakthroughs were not products of isolated genius but the result of a sustained intellectual, philosophical, and experimental tradition. Nature, in this context, functioned not merely as aesthetic inspiration but as an epistemological and procedural partner in design thinking. The widespread use of small-scale models in the twentieth century architecture is examined as a pivotal tool for generating architectural knowledge. By revisiting the works of prominent figures of tectonic architecture, the study demonstrates how architectural form emerged from interdisciplinary discourse and cultural continuity rather than rupture. Ultimately, innovation is recast as a collective and cumulative process, embedded within a deeper heritage of dialogue between human reason and natural order.
Motamedmanesh,M. (2024). From Nature to Technological Architecture: An Epistemological Framework. Philosophy of Science, 14(1), 253-286. doi: 10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775
MLA
Motamedmanesh,M. . "From Nature to Technological Architecture: An Epistemological Framework", Philosophy of Science, 14, 1, 2024, 253-286. doi: 10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775
HARVARD
Motamedmanesh M. (2024). 'From Nature to Technological Architecture: An Epistemological Framework', Philosophy of Science, 14(1), pp. 253-286. doi: 10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775
CHICAGO
M. Motamedmanesh, "From Nature to Technological Architecture: An Epistemological Framework," Philosophy of Science, 14 1 (2024): 253-286, doi: 10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775
VANCOUVER
Motamedmanesh M. From Nature to Technological Architecture: An Epistemological Framework. Philosophy of Science, 2024; 14(1): 253-286. doi: 10.30465/ps.2025.51556.1775