What does it mean for a scientist to have good sense?

Sadrforati, Mohammad Mahdi; Mohammadi, Shadi

doi:10.30465/ps.2020.5141

What does it mean for a scientist to have good sense?

Document Type : .

Authors

Mohammad Mahdi Sadrforati ¹

Shadi Mohammadi ²

¹ The Faculty of Historical and Philosophical Studies, University of Melbourne

² University of Amirkabir

https://doi.org/10.30465/ps.2020.5141

Abstract

Having ‘good sense’ in choosing among rival scientific theories was initially introduced by Pierre Duhem. According to him, where empirical evidence and logical rules cannot help to choose among scientific options, scientists need a further criterion to help them decide. However, Duhem left this notion undeveloped and open for further discussions to find its nature and the way it works. This paper starts with evaluating David Stump’s and Milena Ivanova’s accounts, two major scholars in this debate. Having considered the cons and pros of each account, we will come up with a social understanding of ‘good sense’, according to which this notion is characterized by the way successful scientists actually theorize and practice science and the community of scientists accepts them.

Keywords

Good sense

Duhem

Theory choose

social acceptance

epistemology

زیباکلام، سعید (1396)، افسانه‌های آرام‌بخش، تهران: اسم.

قاسمی‌نراقی، مریم (۱۳۸۹) «دوئم و واقع‌گرایی علمی»، جستارهای فلسفی، دورۀ 6، ش ۱۷.

مقدم‌حیدری، غلامحسین (۱۳۹۳)، علم و عقلانیت نزد پل فایرابند، تهران: نشر نی.

Collins, H. and T. Pinch (2008), The Golem: What You Should Know about Science,Second Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duhem, P. (1954), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Duhem, P. (1991), German Science: Some Reflections on German Science and German Virtues, trans. John Lyon, La Salle, IL: Open Court.

Fairweather, A. (2011), “The Epistemic Value Of Good Sense”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, vol. 43, no. 1.

Hilliam, R. (2005), Galileo Galilei: Father of Modern Science, The Rosen Publishing Group

Ivanova, M. (2010), “Pierre Duhem's Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 41.

Kuhn, T. S. (2000), The Road Since Structure, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Laudan, L. (1981), “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, no. 1.

Paternotte, C. and M. Ivanova (2017), “Virtues and Vices in Scientific Practice”, Synthese, vol. 194, no. 5.

Stump, D. (2007), “Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 38.

Stump, D. (2011), “The Scientist as Impartial Judge: Moral Values in Duhem's Philosophy of Science”, New Perspectives on Pierre Duhem’s The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory (Book Symposium), Metascience, vol. 20.

Van Fraassen, B. (2007), “From a View of Science to a New Empiricism”, in: Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stance with a Reply by Bas Van Fraassen, B. Monton (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.