خروج از دوگانگی تکنولوژی خودمختار و تکنولوژی به مثابة وسیلة صرف؛ بر اساس دیدگاه برونو لاتور

نوع مقاله: علمی-پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 *دانشجوی دکتری فلسفة علم پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی

2 استادیار گروه فلسفة علم، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی

چکیده

برونو لاتور با بازتعریف انسان و مصنوعات و دفاع از ناهم‌جنس ‌بودن و چندرگه ‌بودن‌ آن‌ها، و لحاظ‌ کردن مصنوعات به عنوان واسطه‌های واقعی‌ و نه وسیلة صرف‌های صرف، از جایگاه آن‌ها به عنوان شهروندان جامعه در کنار انسان‌ها و اشیا دفاع می‌کند. وی با این کار ما را از دوگانگی تکنولوژی خودمختار یا تکنولوژی به مثابة وسیلة صرف خارج می‌کند و لذا از فضای سلطه (سلطة انسان بر غیرانسان یا غیرانسان بر انسان) می‌رهاند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Leaving the Dichotomy of Autonomous Technology and Technology as an Intermediary Based on Latour’s Point of View

نویسندگان [English]

  • Rahman sharifzadeh 1
  • Golamhossein MoghadamHeidari 2
1 ; PhD student in philosophy of science and technology, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
2 assistant professor of philosophy of science department, Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies
چکیده [English]

 
Bruno Latour, redefining human and their artifacts and defending their multi-threaded nature, considering their intermediaries (not only as devices), defends their status as citizens. Doing this he frees us from the duality of the autonomous technology and therefore from the domination atmosphere (domination of human over non-human and domination of non-human over man).

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Latour
  • autonomous technology
  • Domination
  • intermediary
  • mediation
Akrich, Madeleine and Bruno Latour (1992). ‘A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies’, In Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/ Building Society, Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Borgmann, Albert (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry, Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

Collingridge, David (1980). The Social Control of Technology, London: Frances Printer.

Ellul, Jacques (1964). The Technological Society, Trans. John Wilkinson, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative Modernity, The Technical Turn in Philosophy and Social Theory, Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Feenberg, A. (2009). ‘Critical Theory of Technology’, In A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, Technological Condition, J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen and V. F. Hendricks (eds.), Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Heidegger, M. (1976 [1954]). ‘The Question Concerning Technology’, In D. Krell (ed.), Martin Heidegger: Basic Writings, New York: Harper & Row.

Latour, Bruno (1987). Science in Action, How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1992). ‘Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts’, In Wiebe E. Bijker and John Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/ Building Society, Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Latour, Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (1994). ‘On Technological Mediation: Philosophy, Psychology, Geneaology’, Common Knowledge, Vol. 94, No. 4.

Latour, Bruno (1999). Pandora’s Hope, Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Latour, Bruno (2002). ‘Morality and Technology, The End of the Means’, Theory, Culture, and Society, Vol. 19, No. 5.

Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mitcham, Carl and Katinka Waelbers (2009). ‘Technology and Ethics: Overview’, In A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, Technological Condition, J. K. B. Olsen (ed.), S. A. Pedersen and V. F. Hendricks.

Winner, L. (1986). ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?,’ in The Whale and the Reactor (Chicago, Ill./London: University of Chicago Press).

Winner, Langdon (1987). Autonomous Technology, Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, MIT Press.