<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>IHCS</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy of Science</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2383-0722</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>13</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Mary Hesse’s Hermeneutic Approach in Understanding Scientific Concepts; an Explanation</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Mary Hesse’s Hermeneutic Approach in Understanding Scientific Concepts; an Explanation</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>22</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">2712</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Saide</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. student in Philosophy of Education, Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Shahin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Iravani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy of Education department, Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Khosrow</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bagheri NoaParast</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Philosophy of Education department, Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammd Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sharafi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Philosophy of Education department, Tehran University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study consists of three parts: reviewing approaches in philosophy of science; presenting Mary Hesse’s hermeneutic approach and, finally, extracting Hesse&#039;s view on the understanding of scientific concepts. In order to clarify Hesse’s approach, we, in the first part, review the post-positivistic space of philosophy of science in the second half of the 20th century. In the second section, the models Hesse has proposed to explain the mechanism of science advancement and scientific theories are described. Emphasizing the explanatory function of metaphor in scientific theories, suggesting minimalistic realism as a requirement for scientific activity, and explaining the dual objectivity for science, are among the achievements of Hesse&#039;s view in philosophy of science. Scientific concepts have a certain place in Hesse&#039;s discussions, and it can be argued that, in Hessian approach, scientific concepts are historical and theoretical and can be used as metaphors in the metaphorical language of science. Finally, people&#039;s understanding of scientific concepts would be different according to the characteristics of the concepts. Also peoples’ understanding of scientific concepts is dynamic due to the dynamics of the language of science</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study consists of three parts: reviewing approaches in philosophy of science; presenting Mary Hesse’s hermeneutic approach and, finally, extracting Hesse&#039;s view on the understanding of scientific concepts. In order to clarify Hesse’s approach, we, in the first part, review the post-positivistic space of philosophy of science in the second half of the 20th century. In the second section, the models Hesse has proposed to explain the mechanism of science advancement and scientific theories are described. Emphasizing the explanatory function of metaphor in scientific theories, suggesting minimalistic realism as a requirement for scientific activity, and explaining the dual objectivity for science, are among the achievements of Hesse&#039;s view in philosophy of science. Scientific concepts have a certain place in Hesse&#039;s discussions, and it can be argued that, in Hessian approach, scientific concepts are historical and theoretical and can be used as metaphors in the metaphorical language of science. Finally, people&#039;s understanding of scientific concepts would be different according to the characteristics of the concepts. Also peoples’ understanding of scientific concepts is dynamic due to the dynamics of the language of science</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">hermeneutic approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">philosophy of science</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mary Hesse</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">understanding</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">scientific concepts</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://philosophy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_2712_e2965530874bfbd525b50d3522afa616.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
