<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>IHCS</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Philosophy of Science</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2383-0722</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>10</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A study on the possibility of inertia in Aristotelian physics</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A study on the possibility of inertia in Aristotelian physics</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>97</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>111</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1985</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farzane</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghadamyari</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A in Philosophy, Allame Tabataba’i University, Literature &amp; Foreign languages Faculty</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hossein</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kalbasi Ashtari</LastName>
<Affiliation>Professor of Philosophy, Allame Tabataba’i University, Literature &amp; Foreign languages Faculty</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>08</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Analysis of the concept of inertia as the first law of motion in classical physics, on which the explanation of movement is based, and Aristotelian and classical physics as two intellectual mainstreams, which have been dominant for hundreds of years, is the main concern of this article. In this paper possibility of the concept of inertia in Aristotelian physics will be questioned and analyzed. It should be noted that the possibility of assigning the components of the two physics to each other or matching them has always been the concern of scholars. The findings of this paper indicate that Aristotle through discussing concepts of natural motion and forced motion implicitly mentioned the concept of inertia.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Analysis of the concept of inertia as the first law of motion in classical physics, on which the explanation of movement is based, and Aristotelian and classical physics as two intellectual mainstreams, which have been dominant for hundreds of years, is the main concern of this article. In this paper possibility of the concept of inertia in Aristotelian physics will be questioned and analyzed. It should be noted that the possibility of assigning the components of the two physics to each other or matching them has always been the concern of scholars. The findings of this paper indicate that Aristotle through discussing concepts of natural motion and forced motion implicitly mentioned the concept of inertia.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Aristotle</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">inertia</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">natural motion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">forced motion</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the ultimate cause</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://philosophy.ihcs.ac.ir/article_1985_6948ba7dfc6ce196a0ca3d9179b87fc1.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
